Novo Nordisk A/S or Mesoblast Limited: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Novo Nordisk vs. Mesoblast

__timestampMesoblast LimitedNovo Nordisk A/S
Wednesday, January 1, 20145417000026760000000
Thursday, January 1, 20156537800032169000000
Friday, January 1, 20165226300032339000000
Sunday, January 1, 20173507200032124000000
Monday, January 1, 20182741500033313000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193698300035830000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205091800036886000000
Friday, January 1, 20216358600041058000000
Saturday, January 1, 20225796700050684000000
Sunday, January 1, 20235310700061598000000
Monday, January 1, 20242362600067377000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Novo Nordisk A/S or Mesoblast Limited?

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. From 2014 to 2023, Novo Nordisk A/S and Mesoblast Limited have shown contrasting approaches to handling these costs. Novo Nordisk, a global leader in diabetes care, has consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $61.6 billion in 2023. This reflects their expansive market reach and robust marketing strategies. In contrast, Mesoblast Limited, a smaller biotech firm, has maintained a more conservative SG&A expenditure, averaging around $47 million annually. Interestingly, Mesoblast's SG&A costs decreased by about 56% from 2015 to 2024, indicating a strategic shift towards cost efficiency. While Novo Nordisk's expenses have grown, their scale and market penetration justify the investment. This analysis highlights the diverse strategies employed by pharmaceutical companies in managing operational costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025