Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited

SG&A Expenses: Alpine vs. HUTCHMED - A Decade of Growth

__timestampAlpine Immune Sciences, Inc.HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014228770926684000
Thursday, January 1, 2015684400029829000
Friday, January 1, 2016858600039578000
Sunday, January 1, 2017607900043277000
Monday, January 1, 2018836200048645000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019946700052934000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201089900061349000
Friday, January 1, 202114560000127125000
Saturday, January 1, 202217968000136106000
Sunday, January 1, 202322222000133175999
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Alpine Immune Sciences vs. HUTCHMED

In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology, operational efficiency is paramount. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent players: Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited, from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, HUTCHMED consistently outpaced Alpine in SG&A spending, with a peak in 2022 where its expenses were approximately six times higher than Alpine's. Notably, Alpine's SG&A expenses grew nearly tenfold, from $2.3 million in 2014 to $22.2 million in 2023, reflecting its strategic expansion efforts. Meanwhile, HUTCHMED's expenses surged from $26.7 million to $133.2 million, underscoring its aggressive market positioning. This financial trajectory highlights the contrasting growth strategies of these companies, offering insights into their operational priorities and market ambitions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025