Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: Arrowhead vs. Supernus Pharmaceuticals

__timestampArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142441953672471000
Thursday, January 1, 20153471808989204000
Friday, January 1, 201640998209106010000
Sunday, January 1, 201732022880137905000
Monday, January 1, 201819110051159888000
Tuesday, January 1, 201926556257158425000
Wednesday, January 1, 202052275890200677000
Friday, January 1, 202180981000304759000
Saturday, January 1, 2022124431000377221000
Sunday, January 1, 202390932000336361000
Monday, January 1, 202498761000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, operational efficiency is key. Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Arrowhead's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 300%, peaking in 2022. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in operational capabilities. In contrast, Supernus Pharmaceuticals experienced a more than 400% increase in SG&A expenses, with a notable peak in 2022, indicating a robust growth strategy. However, data for 2024 is missing for Supernus, leaving room for speculation on their current trajectory. These trends highlight the dynamic nature of the pharmaceutical industry, where strategic spending can significantly impact market positioning. As these companies continue to evolve, their SG&A expenses will remain a critical indicator of their operational strategies and market ambitions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025