Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

SG&A Cost Management: Arrowhead vs. Taro

__timestampArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142441953691733000
Thursday, January 1, 20153471808987644000
Friday, January 1, 20164099820992365000
Sunday, January 1, 20173202288085656000
Monday, January 1, 20181911005188196000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192655625789971000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205227589093413000
Friday, January 1, 20218098100091355000
Saturday, January 1, 2022124431000113676000
Sunday, January 1, 202390932000198366000
Monday, January 1, 202498761000218935000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in this area. From 2014 to 2024, Taro consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at over 218% of Arrowhead's costs in 2024. However, Arrowhead's expenses surged by approximately 305% from 2014 to 2022, indicating a strategic shift. Despite Taro's higher absolute expenses, their steady trend suggests a controlled approach, while Arrowhead's fluctuating costs reflect dynamic growth and investment strategies. This analysis provides a fascinating insight into how two industry leaders navigate financial management, offering valuable lessons for investors and competitors alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025