__timestamp | BeiGene, Ltd. | Evotec SE |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 6930000 | 17990000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 7311000 | 25166000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 20097000 | 27013000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 62602000 | 42383000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 195385000 | 57012000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 388249000 | 66546000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 600176000 | 77238000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 990123000 | 105445000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1277852000 | 156190000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1504501000 | 169610000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology, operational efficiency is paramount. Over the past decade, BeiGene, Ltd. and Evotec SE have demonstrated contrasting trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, BeiGene's SG&A expenses skyrocketed by over 21,000%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and strategic investments. In contrast, Evotec SE's expenses grew by approximately 840%, indicating a more measured approach.
These trends highlight the diverse strategies employed by biotech firms in navigating the competitive landscape.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for AstraZeneca PLC and Evotec SE
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Novartis AG and Evotec SE
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Evotec SE: SG&A Expense Trends
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Zoetis Inc. and BeiGene, Ltd.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Evotec SE
BeiGene, Ltd. and Exelixis, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of BeiGene, Ltd. and Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. or Evotec SE: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Summit Therapeutics Inc. and Evotec SE
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. or Evotec SE
MorphoSys AG and Evotec SE: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Bausch Health Companies Inc. or Evotec SE: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?