Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. or Evotec SE

SG&A Cost Management: Sarepta vs. Evotec

__timestampEvotec SESarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141799000049315000
Thursday, January 1, 20152516600075043000
Friday, January 1, 20162701300083749000
Sunday, January 1, 201742383000122682000
Monday, January 1, 201857012000207761000
Tuesday, January 1, 201966546000284812000
Wednesday, January 1, 202077238000317875000
Friday, January 1, 2021105445000282660000
Saturday, January 1, 2022156190000451421000
Sunday, January 1, 2023169610000481871000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and Evotec SE have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Sarepta's SG&A expenses surged by over 870%, reflecting its aggressive expansion strategy. In contrast, Evotec SE maintained a more conservative growth, with a 840% increase in the same period. By 2023, Sarepta's SG&A expenses were nearly three times higher than Evotec's, highlighting its larger operational scale. However, Evotec's steady approach may suggest a more sustainable cost management strategy. As these companies continue to evolve, their ability to balance growth with cost efficiency will be pivotal in determining their long-term success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025