Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Blueprint Medicines Corporation and Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc.

Biotech Giants: A Decade of SG&A Cost Evolution

__timestampAlpine Immune Sciences, Inc.Blueprint Medicines Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201422877097890000
Thursday, January 1, 2015684400014456000
Friday, January 1, 2016858600019218000
Sunday, January 1, 2017607900027986000
Monday, January 1, 2018836200047928000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019946700096388000
Wednesday, January 1, 202010899000157743000
Friday, January 1, 202114560000195293000
Saturday, January 1, 202217968000237374000
Sunday, January 1, 202322222000295141000
Monday, January 1, 2024359272000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Decade of SG&A Evolution in Biotech

Comparing Operational Costs of Blueprint Medicines and Alpine Immune Sciences

In the dynamic world of biotechnology, operational efficiency is key to sustaining innovation. Over the past decade, Blueprint Medicines Corporation and Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Blueprint Medicines saw a staggering increase of over 3,600% in SG&A expenses, reflecting its aggressive expansion and scaling efforts. In contrast, Alpine Immune Sciences experienced a more modest rise of approximately 870%, indicating a more measured growth strategy.

By 2023, Blueprint's SG&A expenses were nearly 13 times higher than Alpine's, underscoring its larger operational footprint. This analysis not only highlights the strategic differences between these two biotech players but also offers insights into how operational costs can shape a company's competitive edge in the industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025