Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Verona Pharma plc

SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Divergence in Pharma Giants

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyVerona Pharma plc
Wednesday, January 1, 201456990000001802274
Thursday, January 1, 201550010000002512761
Friday, January 1, 201650020000002894488
Sunday, January 1, 201748490000008096274
Monday, January 1, 201845510000007985229
Tuesday, January 1, 201948710000008994597
Wednesday, January 1, 2020766100000029772000
Friday, January 1, 2021769000000033907000
Saturday, January 1, 2022781400000026579000
Sunday, January 1, 2023777200000049868547
Monday, January 1, 20248414000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Decade of SG&A: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. Verona Pharma

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, operational efficiency is paramount. Over the past decade, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) and Verona Pharma plc (VRNA) have showcased contrasting strategies in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Bristol-Myers Squibb, a titan in the industry, consistently allocated substantial resources, with SG&A expenses peaking at approximately $7.8 billion in 2022, reflecting a 37% increase from 2014. In contrast, Verona Pharma, a smaller player, demonstrated a more conservative approach, with expenses growing from $1.8 million in 2014 to nearly $50 million in 2023, marking a staggering 2,670% rise. This divergence highlights the scale and strategic priorities of each company, offering insights into their operational frameworks. As the pharmaceutical sector continues to innovate, understanding these financial dynamics is crucial for stakeholders and investors alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025