Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Genmab A/S and Blueprint Medicines Corporation

SG&A Expenses: Genmab vs. Blueprint Medicines, 2014-2023

__timestampBlueprint Medicines CorporationGenmab A/S
Wednesday, January 1, 2014789000079529000
Thursday, January 1, 20151445600091224000
Friday, January 1, 201619218000102413000
Sunday, January 1, 201727986000146987000
Monday, January 1, 201847928000213695000
Tuesday, January 1, 201996388000342000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020157743000661000000
Friday, January 1, 20211952930001283000000
Saturday, January 1, 20222373740002676000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232951410003297000000
Monday, January 1, 20243592720003790000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Genmab A/S vs. Blueprint Medicines Corporation

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, operational efficiency is key to sustaining growth and innovation. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent players: Genmab A/S and Blueprint Medicines Corporation, from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Genmab A/S has consistently outpaced Blueprint Medicines in SG&A spending, reflecting its expansive operational scale. By 2023, Genmab's SG&A expenses surged to nearly 3.3 billion, marking a staggering 4,000% increase from 2014. In contrast, Blueprint Medicines saw a more modest rise, with expenses reaching approximately 295 million, a 3,600% increase. This disparity highlights Genmab's aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions, potentially fueling its market dominance. As the industry continues to grow, understanding these financial dynamics offers valuable insights into strategic priorities and competitive positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025