Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Blueprint Medicines Corporation or Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech Giants: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampBlueprint Medicines CorporationMadrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014789000015746000
Thursday, January 1, 20151445600013392000
Friday, January 1, 2016192180009290000
Sunday, January 1, 2017279860007672000
Monday, January 1, 20184792800015293000
Tuesday, January 1, 20199638800022648000
Wednesday, January 1, 202015774300021864000
Friday, January 1, 202119529300037318000
Saturday, January 1, 202223737400048130000
Sunday, January 1, 2023295141000108146000
Monday, January 1, 2024359272000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Blueprint Medicines Corporation and Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have taken different paths in this regard over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Blueprint Medicines saw a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 3,600%, while Madrigal Pharmaceuticals experienced a more modest rise of around 590%. This stark contrast highlights Blueprint's aggressive expansion strategy, reflected in its 2023 SG&A expenses, which are nearly three times higher than Madrigal's. However, Madrigal's more conservative approach may suggest a focus on lean operations. As the biotech industry continues to evolve, these companies' strategies offer valuable insights into balancing growth with cost efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025