Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Grifols, S.A. or Novavax, Inc.

Grifols vs. Novavax: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampGrifols, S.A.Novavax, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201466077200019928000
Thursday, January 1, 201573643500030842000
Friday, January 1, 201677526600046527000
Sunday, January 1, 201786034800034451000
Monday, January 1, 201881477500034409000
Tuesday, January 1, 201994282100034417000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020985616000145290000
Friday, January 1, 20211061508000298358000
Saturday, January 1, 20221190423000488691000
Sunday, January 1, 20231254234000468946000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Grifols, S.A. and Novavax, Inc. have taken distinct paths in this regard over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Grifols consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately 1.25 billion in 2023. This reflects a steady increase of around 90% from 2014. In contrast, Novavax's SG&A expenses surged dramatically, especially post-2020, reaching nearly 470 million in 2023, a staggering 23-fold increase from 2014.

While Grifols' approach suggests a stable, incremental investment in administrative functions, Novavax's sharp rise indicates a strategic pivot, possibly linked to its COVID-19 vaccine development. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into how these companies navigate financial strategies in a dynamic market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025