Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Incyte Corporation and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A: Incyte vs. CymaBay

__timestampCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.Incyte Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20148185000165772000
Thursday, January 1, 20158871000196614000
Friday, January 1, 20169645000303251000
Sunday, January 1, 201712387000366406000
Monday, January 1, 201814381000434407000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919238000468711000
Wednesday, January 1, 202017425000516922000
Friday, January 1, 202123040000739560000
Saturday, January 1, 2022251160001002140000
Sunday, January 1, 2023519530001161300000
Monday, January 1, 20241242157000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Decade of SG&A: Incyte vs. CymaBay

In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology, operational efficiency is paramount. Over the past decade, Incyte Corporation and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Incyte's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 600% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its aggressive expansion and strategic investments. In contrast, CymaBay's expenses have grown by about 535%, indicating a more measured approach.

Key Insights

  • Incyte's Growth: By 2023, Incyte's SG&A expenses reached over $1.16 billion, a testament to its robust growth strategy.
  • CymaBay's Strategy: CymaBay, while smaller, saw its expenses peak at $51.95 million in 2023, highlighting its focus on sustainable growth.

This analysis underscores the diverse strategies employed by biotech firms in managing operational costs, offering valuable insights for investors and industry stakeholders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025