__timestamp | CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. | Evotec SE |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 8185000 | 17990000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 8871000 | 25166000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 9645000 | 27013000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 12387000 | 42383000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 14381000 | 57012000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 19238000 | 66546000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 17425000 | 77238000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 23040000 | 105445000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 25116000 | 156190000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 51953000 | 169610000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the competitive landscape of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. and Evotec SE have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs.
From 2014 to 2023, CymaBay's SG&A expenses grew steadily, peaking in 2023 with a 550% increase from 2014. This growth reflects their strategic investments in administrative capabilities and market expansion.
Evotec SE, on the other hand, saw a more dramatic rise in SG&A expenses, with a 840% increase over the same period. This suggests a more aggressive approach in scaling operations and expanding their global footprint.
While both companies have increased their SG&A spending, Evotec's higher growth rate indicates a more expansive strategy, potentially positioning them for greater market influence.
Novo Nordisk A/S and Evotec SE: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Zoetis Inc. and Evotec SE: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Comparing SG&A Expenses: GSK plc vs CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Genmab A/S vs Evotec SE Trends and Insights
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. vs Veracyte, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. vs Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. vs MiMedx Group, Inc.
Viking Therapeutics, Inc. and Evotec SE: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Perrigo Company plc vs Evotec SE
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Vericel Corporation or Evotec SE