__timestamp | China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited | Masco Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 4120000000 | 1607000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 3651000000 | 1339000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 3133000000 | 1403000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 3294000000 | 1442000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 3807000000 | 1478000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 4134000000 | 1274000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1570000000 | 1292000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1128000000 | 1413000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 2933000000 | 1390000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 7254000000 | 1481000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1468000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the world of corporate finance, understanding operational costs is crucial for evaluating a company's efficiency. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry titans: Masco Corporation, a leader in home improvement and building products, and China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited, a major player in the aviation sector.
From 2014 to 2023, China Eastern Airlines experienced a rollercoaster ride in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2023 with a staggering 7.25 billion, a 130% increase from its lowest point in 2021. In contrast, Masco Corporation maintained a more stable trajectory, with expenses fluctuating modestly around 1.4 billion, showcasing a disciplined approach to cost management.
This comparative analysis highlights the dynamic nature of operational costs across industries, offering valuable insights for investors and stakeholders seeking to understand the financial health and strategic priorities of these global corporations.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Masco Corporation vs China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited
Masco Corporation vs China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Masco Corporation and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Masco Corporation and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Masco Corporation or Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Masco Corporation and Pentair plc
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Masco Corporation vs Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Masco Corporation vs XPO Logistics, Inc. Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Masco Corporation vs Textron Inc. Trends and Insights