Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Masco Corporation or Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Masco vs. Jacobs Engineering

__timestampJacobs Engineering Group Inc.Masco Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201415457160001607000000
Thursday, January 1, 201515228110001339000000
Friday, January 1, 201614292330001403000000
Sunday, January 1, 201713799830001442000000
Monday, January 1, 201821803990001478000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201920721770001274000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202020506950001292000000
Friday, January 1, 202123556830001413000000
Saturday, January 1, 202224091900001390000000
Sunday, January 1, 202323980780001481000000
Monday, January 1, 202421403200001468000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Masco Corporation and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. have been at the forefront of this financial balancing act since 2014. Over the past decade, Jacobs Engineering has seen its SG&A expenses rise by approximately 55%, peaking in 2022. In contrast, Masco Corporation has maintained a more stable trajectory, with expenses fluctuating around a 10% range.

A Closer Look at Trends

Jacobs Engineering's SG&A costs surged notably in 2018, marking a 58% increase from 2017, while Masco's expenses remained relatively steady. This trend suggests Jacobs is investing heavily in administrative capabilities, possibly to support growth initiatives. Meanwhile, Masco's consistent expense management reflects a strategic focus on operational efficiency.

As we move into 2024, Masco's data is missing, leaving room for speculation on its future strategies. Will it continue its steady path, or will it pivot to a new approach?

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025