__timestamp | Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. | Novartis AG |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 35942000 | 14993000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 40028000 | 14247000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 45853000 | 14192000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 53816000 | 14997000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 60804000 | 16471000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 77252000 | 14369000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 45736000 | 14197000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 50323000 | 14886000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 143526000 | 14253000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 149182000 | 12489000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 154335000 | 12566000000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, operational efficiency is key to maintaining a competitive edge. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent players: Novartis AG and Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.
Novartis AG, a global healthcare leader, consistently reported SG&A expenses averaging around $14.5 billion annually. Despite fluctuations, their expenses peaked in 2018, reflecting strategic investments in marketing and administration. In contrast, Halozyme Therapeutics, a smaller biotech firm, showed a significant upward trend, with expenses growing by over 300% from 2014 to 2023. This surge, particularly notable in 2022 and 2023, underscores their aggressive expansion and operational scaling.
Understanding these financial dynamics offers insights into each company's strategic priorities and market positioning, highlighting the diverse approaches within the pharmaceutical sector.
Novartis AG and Sanofi: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Novartis AG vs Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Novartis AG vs Gilead Sciences, Inc. Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Novartis AG vs Cytokinetics, Incorporated Trends and Insights
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Novartis AG and Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. or Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and Grifols, S.A.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and Verona Pharma plc
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. vs CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. vs Lantheus Holdings, Inc. Trends and Insights
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. or MannKind Corporation