Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Novo Nordisk A/S and Veracyte, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: Novo Nordisk vs. Veracyte

__timestampNovo Nordisk A/SVeracyte, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142676000000040786000
Thursday, January 1, 20153216900000047876000
Friday, January 1, 20163233900000052035000
Sunday, January 1, 20173212400000055348000
Monday, January 1, 20183331300000065276000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193583000000082720000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203688600000089118000
Friday, January 1, 202141058000000181193000
Saturday, January 1, 202250684000000174078000
Sunday, January 1, 202361598000000184232000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Tale of Two Companies: SG&A Expenses Over Time

In the world of pharmaceuticals and diagnostics, operational efficiency is key. Novo Nordisk A/S, a leader in diabetes care, and Veracyte, Inc., a pioneer in genomic diagnostics, present a fascinating study in contrasts when it comes to Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Novo Nordisk's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 130%, reflecting its expansive global operations and marketing efforts. In contrast, Veracyte's expenses have grown by about 350%, indicative of its rapid scaling and market penetration efforts.

Key Insights

  • Novo Nordisk A/S: Despite a steady increase, the company's SG&A expenses remain a small fraction of its revenue, showcasing operational efficiency.
  • Veracyte, Inc.: The sharp rise in expenses highlights its aggressive growth strategy, essential for a company in its growth phase.

This analysis underscores the diverse strategies employed by companies in different growth stages and sectors.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025