Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Fair Isaac Corporation

SG&A Expenses: Palo Alto Networks vs. Fair Isaac

__timestampFair Isaac CorporationPalo Alto Networks, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014278203000407912000
Thursday, January 1, 2015300002000624261000
Friday, January 1, 2016328940000914400000
Sunday, January 1, 20173397960001117400000
Monday, January 1, 20183803620001356200000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194140860001605800000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204209300001819800000
Friday, January 1, 20213962810002144900000
Saturday, January 1, 20223838630002553900000
Sunday, January 1, 20234005650002991700000
Monday, January 1, 20244628340003475000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Decade of SG&A Evolution: Palo Alto Networks vs. Fair Isaac Corporation

In the ever-evolving landscape of operational costs, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses serve as a critical indicator of a company's efficiency and strategic focus. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2024, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Fair Isaac Corporation have showcased contrasting trajectories in their SG&A expenditures.

Palo Alto Networks has seen a staggering increase of over 750% in SG&A expenses, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and expansion in the cybersecurity sector. In contrast, Fair Isaac Corporation's SG&A expenses have grown by approximately 66%, indicating a more stable and controlled approach in the analytics and software industry.

This comparison not only highlights the differing business strategies but also underscores the dynamic nature of operational costs in the tech industry. As we move forward, these trends offer valuable insights into how companies allocate resources to maintain competitive edges.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025