Palo Alto Networks, Inc. or The Trade Desk, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Tech Giants' SG&A Strategies: A Decade in Review

__timestampPalo Alto Networks, Inc.The Trade Desk, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201440791200023975000
Thursday, January 1, 201562426100040070000
Friday, January 1, 201691440000078219000
Sunday, January 1, 20171117400000119825000
Monday, January 1, 20181356200000171981000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191605800000275930000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201819800000346359000
Friday, January 1, 20212144900000623959000
Saturday, January 1, 20222553900000863142000
Sunday, January 1, 20232991700000968248000
Monday, January 1, 202434750000001082333000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Palo Alto Networks or The Trade Desk?

In the competitive landscape of tech giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Palo Alto Networks and The Trade Desk have shown distinct strategies in handling these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Palo Alto Networks saw a consistent rise in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $3.5 billion in 2024. This represents a staggering 750% increase from their 2014 figures. In contrast, The Trade Desk, while also experiencing growth, managed to keep their SG&A expenses under $1 billion by 2023, marking a more conservative approach with a 4000% increase from 2014. This data highlights Palo Alto Networks' aggressive expansion strategy, while The Trade Desk appears to focus on cost efficiency. As we look to the future, the missing data for 2024 for The Trade Desk leaves room for speculation on their next financial moves.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025