Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and NetApp, Inc.

SG&A Trends: Palo Alto Networks vs. NetApp

__timestampNetApp, Inc.Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142179200000407912000
Thursday, January 1, 20152197400000624261000
Friday, January 1, 20162099000000914400000
Sunday, January 1, 201719040000001117400000
Monday, January 1, 201820090000001356200000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919350000001605800000
Wednesday, January 1, 202018480000001819800000
Friday, January 1, 202120010000002144900000
Saturday, January 1, 202221360000002553900000
Sunday, January 1, 202320940000002991700000
Monday, January 1, 202421360000003475000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Decade of SG&A: Palo Alto Networks vs. NetApp

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, operational efficiency is paramount. Over the past decade, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and NetApp, Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2024, Palo Alto Networks has seen a staggering 750% increase in SG&A expenses, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and market expansion. In contrast, NetApp's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, with a slight decrease of around 2% over the same period, indicating a focus on cost management and operational stability.

Key Insights

  • Palo Alto Networks: From a modest start in 2014, the company’s SG&A expenses have surged, peaking in 2024, highlighting its commitment to scaling operations.
  • NetApp: Despite fluctuations, NetApp has maintained a consistent SG&A expense profile, emphasizing efficiency.

This analysis underscores the strategic priorities of these tech giants, offering a window into their operational philosophies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025