SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Palo Alto vs. Pure Storage

__timestampPalo Alto Networks, Inc.Pure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201440791200060652000
Thursday, January 1, 2015624261000184674000
Friday, January 1, 2016914400000315976000
Sunday, January 1, 20171117400000444687000
Monday, January 1, 20181356200000575200000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191605800000721617000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201819800000891175000
Friday, January 1, 20212144900000898491000
Saturday, January 1, 20222553900000988982000
Sunday, January 1, 202329917000001121605000
Monday, January 1, 202434750000001197264000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Innovators

In the competitive landscape of tech giants, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc. have carved distinct paths in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2024, Palo Alto Networks has seen a staggering 750% increase in SG&A expenses, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. In contrast, Pure Storage's SG&A expenses have grown by approximately 1,870%, showcasing its rapid expansion in the data storage sector.

A Decade of Growth

Palo Alto Networks started with SG&A expenses of $408 million in 2014, reaching $3.475 billion by 2024. Meanwhile, Pure Storage began with a modest $61 million, climbing to $1.197 billion. This growth highlights their commitment to scaling operations and capturing market share. As these companies continue to innovate, their SG&A efficiency will be crucial in maintaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025