Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Biotech SG&A Trends: Rhythm vs. Iovance Over a Decade

__timestampIovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201493357721213000
Thursday, January 1, 2015123900003425000
Friday, January 1, 2016256020006311000
Sunday, January 1, 2017212620009518000
Monday, January 1, 20182843000028080000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194084900036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206021000046125000
Friday, January 1, 20218366400068486000
Saturday, January 1, 202210409700092032000
Sunday, January 1, 2023106916000117532000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Decade of SG&A Trends in Biotech: Rhythm vs. Iovance

In the ever-evolving biotech industry, operational costs are a critical factor in determining a company's financial health. Over the past decade, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. have shown significant shifts in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Iovance's SG&A expenses surged by over 1,000%, reflecting their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. Meanwhile, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals experienced an even more dramatic increase, with their SG&A costs skyrocketing by nearly 9,600% during the same period.

Key Insights

  • 2014-2018: Both companies maintained relatively modest SG&A expenses, with Iovance consistently outspending Rhythm.
  • 2019-2023: A notable shift occurred as Rhythm's expenses caught up and eventually surpassed Iovance by 2023, indicating a strategic pivot towards scaling operations.

These trends highlight the dynamic nature of the biotech sector, where strategic investments in operational infrastructure can significantly impact a company's trajectory.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025