Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Summit Therapeutics Inc. and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: Summit vs. Sarepta Over a Decade

__timestampSarepta Therapeutics, Inc.Summit Therapeutics Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014493150006795238
Thursday, January 1, 2015750430007454247
Friday, January 1, 20168374900010345862
Sunday, January 1, 201712268200016984203
Monday, January 1, 201820776100016187290
Tuesday, January 1, 20192848120009299233.54
Wednesday, January 1, 202031787500019232000
Friday, January 1, 202128266000023611000
Saturday, January 1, 202245142100026700000
Sunday, January 1, 202348187100028215000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Decade of SG&A: Summit vs. Sarepta

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, operational efficiency is key. Over the past decade, Summit Therapeutics Inc. and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Sarepta's SG&A expenses surged by over 870%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies. In contrast, Summit's expenses grew by approximately 315%, indicating a more conservative approach. Notably, in 2023, Sarepta's SG&A expenses were nearly 17 times higher than Summit's, highlighting the scale of its operations. This divergence underscores the varied strategic priorities of these companies, with Sarepta focusing on rapid growth and Summit maintaining a leaner operational model. As the biotech sector continues to evolve, these financial strategies will play a crucial role in shaping the future of these industry players.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025