Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Viking Therapeutics, Inc. and Veracyte, Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A: A Decade of Divergence

__timestampVeracyte, Inc.Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014407860001244910
Thursday, January 1, 2015478760005029636
Friday, January 1, 2016520350004846776
Sunday, January 1, 2017553480005329003
Monday, January 1, 2018652760007121000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019827200009128000
Wednesday, January 1, 20208911800010731000
Friday, January 1, 202118119300010701000
Saturday, January 1, 202217407800016121000
Sunday, January 1, 202318423200037021000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Decade of SG&A Evolution: Viking Therapeutics vs. Veracyte

In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology, operational efficiency is paramount. Over the past decade, Veracyte, Inc. and Viking Therapeutics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Veracyte's SG&A costs have surged by over 350% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies. In contrast, Viking Therapeutics, while experiencing a significant increase, has maintained a more conservative growth in SG&A, with a rise of approximately 2,870% over the same period. This disparity highlights Veracyte's robust market activities compared to Viking's more measured approach. As of 2023, Veracyte's SG&A expenses are nearly five times those of Viking, underscoring its larger operational scale. These insights provide a window into the strategic priorities of these biotech firms, offering investors a glimpse into their operational dynamics.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025