Oracle Corporation or Electronic Arts Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Oracle vs. EA: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampElectronic Arts Inc.Oracle Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201410900000008605000000
Thursday, January 1, 201510330000008732000000
Friday, January 1, 201610280000009039000000
Sunday, January 1, 201711120000009299000000
Monday, January 1, 201811100000009715000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201911620000009774000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011370000009275000000
Friday, January 1, 202112810000008936000000
Saturday, January 1, 202216340000009364000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023170500000010412000000
Monday, January 1, 202417100000009822000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Oracle vs. Electronic Arts: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Oracle Corporation and Electronic Arts Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2024, Oracle's SG&A expenses have consistently been higher, averaging around $9.36 billion annually, while Electronic Arts maintained a more modest average of approximately $1.27 billion.

Interestingly, Oracle's SG&A expenses peaked in 2023, reaching over $10 billion, a 21% increase from 2014. In contrast, Electronic Arts saw a 57% rise in SG&A costs over the same period, peaking at $1.71 billion in 2024. This data highlights Oracle's larger scale and operational complexity, while Electronic Arts showcases a more agile cost structure. As businesses navigate the post-pandemic economy, these insights offer valuable lessons in strategic financial management.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025