Palo Alto Networks, Inc. or Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Comparing SG&A cost management in cybersecurity giants.

__timestampCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd.Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014384921000407912000
Thursday, January 1, 2015451785000624261000
Friday, January 1, 2016508656000914400000
Sunday, January 1, 20175253920001117400000
Monday, January 1, 20185897990001356200000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196584000001605800000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206814000001819800000
Friday, January 1, 20217085000002144900000
Saturday, January 1, 20227913000002553900000
Sunday, January 1, 20238641000002991700000
Monday, January 1, 20243475000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Palo Alto Networks or Check Point Software?

In the competitive landscape of cybersecurity, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. From 2014 to 2023, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. have shown distinct strategies in handling these costs. Palo Alto Networks has seen a significant increase in SG&A expenses, rising by approximately 730% over the decade, reflecting its aggressive growth and expansion strategy. In contrast, Check Point Software has maintained a more conservative approach, with a 124% increase, indicating a focus on cost efficiency. By 2023, Palo Alto's SG&A expenses were nearly 3.5 times higher than Check Point's, highlighting its expansive market reach. However, the data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. This analysis provides a window into how these tech giants balance growth with cost management.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025