Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Palo Alto Networks, Inc. or Leidos Holdings, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Palo Alto vs. Leidos

__timestampLeidos Holdings, Inc.Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014310000000407912000
Thursday, January 1, 2015232000000624261000
Friday, January 1, 2016334000000914400000
Sunday, January 1, 20175520000001117400000
Monday, January 1, 20187290000001356200000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196890000001605800000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207700000001819800000
Friday, January 1, 20218600000002144900000
Saturday, January 1, 20229500000002553900000
Sunday, January 1, 20239420000002991700000
Monday, January 1, 20249830000003475000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of technology and defense, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc. have taken different paths in this regard over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Palo Alto Networks saw a staggering 630% increase in SG&A expenses, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. In contrast, Leidos Holdings experienced a more modest 204% rise, indicating a more conservative approach.

By 2023, Palo Alto Networks' SG&A expenses were nearly three times higher than those of Leidos Holdings, highlighting its expansive operational scale. However, the data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. This comparison underscores the strategic choices companies make in balancing growth and cost efficiency, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025