Palo Alto Networks, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Cost Efficiency: Palo Alto Networks vs. Pure Storage

__timestampPalo Alto Networks, Inc.Pure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201415962800024129000
Thursday, January 1, 201525149900077552000
Friday, January 1, 2016370000000167893000
Sunday, January 1, 2017476600000252279000
Monday, January 1, 2018645300000353781000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019808400000457528000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020999500000509886000
Friday, January 1, 20211274900000535255000
Saturday, January 1, 20221718700000708329000
Sunday, January 1, 20231909700000855788000
Monday, January 1, 20242059199999809430000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Exploring Cost Efficiency: Palo Alto Networks vs. Pure Storage

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc. from 2014 to 2024. Over this decade, Palo Alto Networks has seen a significant increase in its cost of revenue, growing by approximately 1,200%, from $160 million in 2014 to over $2 billion in 2024. In contrast, Pure Storage's cost of revenue rose by about 3,250%, from $24 million to $810 million in the same period. This stark difference highlights the varying growth trajectories and operational strategies of these two tech giants. While both companies have expanded their operations, Palo Alto Networks' larger scale reflects its broader market reach and investment in infrastructure. As the tech industry continues to grow, understanding these financial dynamics is crucial for investors and stakeholders alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025