Pfizer Inc. and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Pfizer vs. Sarepta: A Decade of SG&A Spending

__timestampPfizer Inc.Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141409700000049315000
Thursday, January 1, 20151480900000075043000
Friday, January 1, 20161483700000083749000
Sunday, January 1, 201714784000000122682000
Monday, January 1, 201814455000000207761000
Tuesday, January 1, 201914350000000284812000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011615000000317875000
Friday, January 1, 202112703000000282660000
Saturday, January 1, 202213677000000451421000
Sunday, January 1, 202314771000000481871000
Monday, January 1, 202414730000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Companies

In the world of pharmaceuticals, strategic spending on Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses can be a key differentiator. Over the past decade, Pfizer Inc. and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches. Pfizer, a global giant, consistently allocated around 14% of its revenue to SG&A, peaking in 2016. In contrast, Sarepta, a smaller biotech firm, increased its SG&A spending by nearly 900% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. This divergence highlights the varied paths companies take in scaling operations and market presence. While Pfizer's spending remained relatively stable, Sarepta's surge underscores its commitment to expansion and innovation. As the pharmaceutical landscape evolves, these spending patterns offer insights into each company's strategic priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025