SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and CRISPR Therapeutics AG

Biotech Giants' SG&A Strategies: A Decade of Divergence

__timestampCRISPR Therapeutics AGSarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014511400049315000
Thursday, January 1, 20151340300075043000
Friday, January 1, 20163105600083749000
Sunday, January 1, 201735845000122682000
Monday, January 1, 201848294000207761000
Tuesday, January 1, 201963488000284812000
Wednesday, January 1, 202088208000317875000
Friday, January 1, 2021102802000282660000
Saturday, January 1, 2022102464000451421000
Sunday, January 1, 202376162000481871000
Monday, January 1, 202472977000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotech Innovators

In the dynamic world of biotechnology, understanding a company's operational efficiency is crucial. This analysis compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two pioneering firms: Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and CRISPR Therapeutics AG, from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Sarepta consistently outspent CRISPR, with its SG&A expenses peaking at nearly 482 million in 2023, a staggering 530% increase from 2014. In contrast, CRISPR's expenses grew by approximately 1,390%, reaching 76 million in 2023. This disparity highlights Sarepta's aggressive investment in administrative functions, possibly reflecting its expansive growth strategy. Meanwhile, CRISPR's leaner approach may indicate a focus on innovation and cost efficiency. As the biotech landscape evolves, these financial strategies could significantly impact each company's market positioning and long-term success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025