SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A Strategies: Alnylam vs. Ultragenyx

__timestampAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144452600010811000
Thursday, January 1, 20156061000033001000
Friday, January 1, 20168935400064936000
Sunday, January 1, 201719936500099909000
Monday, January 1, 2018382359000127724000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019479005000161524000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020588420000182933000
Friday, January 1, 2021620639000219982000
Saturday, January 1, 2022770658000278139000
Sunday, January 1, 2023795646000309799000
Monday, January 1, 2024975526000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational expenses is crucial for sustainable growth. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. have been navigating this landscape with distinct strategies over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Alnylam's Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses surged by over 1,600%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment in infrastructure. In contrast, Ultragenyx's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 2,800%, indicating a rapid scale-up in its operations.

A Decade of Growth and Strategy

Alnylam's expenses peaked in 2023, reaching nearly 800 million, while Ultragenyx's expenses were around 310 million. This disparity highlights Alnylam's larger scale and possibly more extensive market reach. However, Ultragenyx's faster growth rate suggests a nimble approach to scaling its operations. As both companies continue to innovate, their SG&A efficiency will be a key indicator of their strategic priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025