Sanofi or Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Sanofi vs. Madrigal: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampMadrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Sanofi
Wednesday, January 1, 2014157460008565000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015133920009496000000
Friday, January 1, 201692900009592000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017767200010164000000
Monday, January 1, 2018152930009934000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019226480009883000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020218640009390000000
Friday, January 1, 2021373180009555000000
Saturday, January 1, 20224813000010539000000
Sunday, January 1, 202310814600010765000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Managing SG&A Costs: Sanofi vs. Madrigal Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Sanofi and Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management.

Sanofi, a global leader, consistently reported SG&A expenses averaging around $9.8 billion annually from 2014 to 2023. Despite fluctuations, their expenses remained relatively stable, reflecting a robust cost management strategy. In contrast, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, a smaller player, saw a dramatic increase in SG&A costs, rising from approximately $15 million in 2014 to over $108 million in 2023, marking a staggering 600% increase.

This data highlights the challenges smaller companies face in scaling operations while managing costs. As Madrigal expands, its ability to control SG&A expenses will be pivotal in sustaining growth and competitiveness.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025