Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Accenture plc vs Fair Isaac Corporation

Accenture vs Fair Isaac: SG&A Expense Trends Unveiled

__timestampAccenture plcFair Isaac Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20145401969000278203000
Thursday, January 1, 20155373370000300002000
Friday, January 1, 20165466982000328940000
Sunday, January 1, 20176397883000339796000
Monday, January 1, 20186601872000380362000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197009614000414086000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207462514000420930000
Friday, January 1, 20218742599000396281000
Saturday, January 1, 202210334358000383863000
Sunday, January 1, 202310858572000400565000
Monday, January 1, 202411128030000462834000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Accenture vs Fair Isaac

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the nuances of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Accenture plc and Fair Isaac Corporation have demonstrated contrasting trajectories in their SG&A expenditures.

Accenture's Strategic Growth

From 2014 to 2024, Accenture's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 106%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and strategic investments. By 2024, Accenture's SG&A costs reached a peak, showcasing its commitment to scaling operations and enhancing service delivery.

Fair Isaac's Steady Path

Conversely, Fair Isaac Corporation has maintained a more conservative growth in SG&A expenses, with a 66% increase over the same period. This steady rise underscores Fair Isaac's focus on sustainable growth and operational efficiency.

Conclusion

This comparative analysis highlights the diverse strategies employed by these industry giants, offering valuable insights into their financial management and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025