Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: ADMA Biologics, Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited

SG&A Expenses: ADMA vs HUTCHMED - A Decade of Growth

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014482386926684000
Thursday, January 1, 2015674596829829000
Friday, January 1, 2016849474239578000
Sunday, January 1, 20171809283543277000
Monday, January 1, 20182250292248645000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192591075752934000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203505081761349000
Friday, January 1, 202142896889127125000
Saturday, January 1, 202252458024136106000
Sunday, January 1, 202359020000133175999
ngram

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: ADMA Biologics, Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited

In the ever-evolving landscape of the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors, understanding the financial health of companies is crucial. Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a key indicator of operational efficiency. Over the past decade, ADMA Biologics, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited have shown distinct trends in their SG&A expenses.

From 2014 to 2023, ADMA Biologics, Inc. saw a steady increase in SG&A costs, rising from approximately $4.8 million to nearly $59 million, marking a growth of over 1,100%. In contrast, HUTCHMED (China) Limited's expenses surged from $26.7 million to $133 million, a 400% increase. This stark difference highlights the varying strategies and market conditions faced by these companies.

Such insights are invaluable for investors and stakeholders aiming to make informed decisions in the competitive biotech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025