ADMA Biologics, Inc. or ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: ADMA vs. ACADIA

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.ADMA Biologics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014327480004823869
Thursday, January 1, 2015908040006745968
Friday, January 1, 20161864560008494742
Sunday, January 1, 201725506200018092835
Monday, January 1, 201826575800022502922
Tuesday, January 1, 201932563800025910757
Wednesday, January 1, 202038866100035050817
Friday, January 1, 202139602800042896889
Saturday, January 1, 202236909000052458024
Sunday, January 1, 202340246600059020000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Cost Management: ADMA Biologics vs. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for sustaining growth and profitability. Over the past decade, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management.

A Decade of Financial Insights

From 2014 to 2023, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $402 million in 2023. This represents a staggering 1,128% increase from their 2014 expenses. In contrast, ADMA Biologics maintained a more conservative approach, with their SG&A costs rising to about $59 million in 2023, marking a 1,123% increase over the same period.

Strategic Implications

While ACADIA's higher expenses may reflect aggressive expansion strategies, ADMA's more modest spending could indicate a focus on operational efficiency. Investors and stakeholders should consider these trends when evaluating the companies' long-term financial health and strategic direction.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025