Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. vs Veracyte, Inc.

Biotech SG&A Trends: CymaBay vs. Veracyte

__timestampCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.Veracyte, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014818500040786000
Thursday, January 1, 2015887100047876000
Friday, January 1, 2016964500052035000
Sunday, January 1, 20171238700055348000
Monday, January 1, 20181438100065276000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191923800082720000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201742500089118000
Friday, January 1, 202123040000181193000
Saturday, January 1, 202225116000174078000
Sunday, January 1, 202351953000184232000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Decade of SG&A Expenses: CymaBay vs. Veracyte

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, understanding financial trends is crucial. Over the past decade, CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. and Veracyte, Inc. have shown distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Veracyte's SG&A costs surged by approximately 350%, peaking in 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies. In contrast, CymaBay's expenses grew by around 530%, with a significant spike in 2023, indicating a strategic shift or increased operational activities. Notably, Veracyte consistently outspent CymaBay, with 2023 figures showing Veracyte's expenses nearly 3.5 times higher. These trends highlight the differing operational strategies and market positions of these two biotech firms. As the industry evolves, monitoring such financial metrics will be key to understanding future growth and sustainability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025