Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Salesforce, Inc. vs Fair Isaac Corporation

Salesforce vs. Fair Isaac: A Decade of SG&A Evolution

__timestampFair Isaac CorporationSalesforce, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142782030002764851000
Thursday, January 1, 20153000020003437032000
Friday, January 1, 20163289400003951445000
Sunday, January 1, 20173397960004777000000
Monday, January 1, 20183803620005760000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194140860007410000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204209300009634000000
Friday, January 1, 202139628100011761000000
Saturday, January 1, 202238386300014453000000
Sunday, January 1, 202340056500016079000000
Monday, January 1, 202446283400015411000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Tale of Two Giants: Salesforce vs. Fair Isaac Corporation

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate America, the battle for efficiency and growth is often reflected in a company's Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Over the past decade, Salesforce, Inc. and Fair Isaac Corporation have showcased contrasting trajectories in their SG&A expenditures.

From 2014 to 2023, Salesforce's SG&A costs surged by an impressive 480%, highlighting its aggressive expansion strategy. In contrast, Fair Isaac Corporation's expenses grew by a modest 44%, reflecting a more conservative approach. By 2023, Salesforce's SG&A expenses were nearly 40 times greater than those of Fair Isaac, underscoring its dominant market position.

This data not only reveals the strategic priorities of these tech titans but also offers insights into their operational efficiencies. As we look to the future, the question remains: will Salesforce's high expenditure continue to drive growth, or will Fair Isaac's steady approach prove more sustainable?

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025