Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Salesforce, Inc. vs The Trade Desk, Inc.

Salesforce vs. The Trade Desk: SG&A Expense Trends Unveiled

__timestampSalesforce, Inc.The Trade Desk, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014276485100023975000
Thursday, January 1, 2015343703200040070000
Friday, January 1, 2016395144500078219000
Sunday, January 1, 20174777000000119825000
Monday, January 1, 20185760000000171981000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197410000000275930000
Wednesday, January 1, 20209634000000346359000
Friday, January 1, 202111761000000623959000
Saturday, January 1, 202214453000000863142000
Sunday, January 1, 202316079000000968248000
Monday, January 1, 2024154110000001082333000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Decade of SG&A Expenses: Salesforce vs. The Trade Desk

In the ever-evolving tech industry, understanding the financial strategies of leading companies is crucial. Over the past decade, Salesforce, Inc. and The Trade Desk, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Salesforce's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 480%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market dominance. In contrast, The Trade Desk, a rising star in digital advertising, saw its SG&A costs grow by nearly 3,930%, albeit from a much smaller base, highlighting its rapid scaling efforts.

Key Insights

  • Salesforce: Peaked in 2023 with SG&A expenses reaching 16 billion, a testament to its sustained growth.
  • The Trade Desk: Despite missing data for 2024, its expenses approached 1 billion in 2023, underscoring its strategic investments.

These trends offer a window into the strategic priorities of these tech giants, with Salesforce focusing on consolidation and The Trade Desk on expansion.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025