Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Sanofi vs ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Sanofi vs. ACADIA: A Decade of SG&A Expense Trends

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.Sanofi
Wednesday, January 1, 2014327480008565000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015908040009496000000
Friday, January 1, 20161864560009592000000
Sunday, January 1, 201725506200010164000000
Monday, January 1, 20182657580009934000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193256380009883000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203886610009390000000
Friday, January 1, 20213960280009555000000
Saturday, January 1, 202236909000010539000000
Sunday, January 1, 202340246600010765000000
Monday, January 1, 20249183000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants: Sanofi vs. ACADIA

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding the financial dynamics of major players is crucial. Over the past decade, Sanofi and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Sanofi's SG&A costs have consistently dwarfed those of ACADIA, averaging nearly 35 times higher. This disparity highlights Sanofi's expansive global operations compared to ACADIA's more focused approach. Notably, Sanofi's expenses peaked in 2023, reaching a staggering 10.8 billion, while ACADIA's highest was 402 million in the same year. Despite the vast difference, ACADIA's expenses have grown over 12 times since 2014, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. This financial narrative underscores the diverse strategies employed by pharmaceutical companies to navigate the competitive landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025