Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Strategic Shifts

__timestampJacobs Engineering Group Inc.Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201415457160002595900000
Thursday, January 1, 201515228110002486400000
Friday, January 1, 201614292330002623900000
Sunday, January 1, 201713799830002980100000
Monday, January 1, 201821803990003171700000
Tuesday, January 1, 201920721770003041000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202020506950003089600000
Friday, January 1, 202123556830003240400000
Saturday, January 1, 202224091900003370000000
Sunday, January 1, 202323980780002829300000
Monday, January 1, 202421403200003310500000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Tale of Two Giants: SG&A Expenses Over Time

In the world of industrial giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This chart compares the SG&A expenses of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Stanley Black & Decker consistently reported higher SG&A costs, peaking in 2022 with a 13% increase from 2014. Meanwhile, Jacobs Engineering saw a significant rise in 2018, with expenses jumping by 58% compared to 2017, reflecting strategic investments or restructuring efforts. However, by 2023, both companies showed a downward trend, with Stanley Black & Decker's expenses decreasing by 16% from the previous year. This data highlights the dynamic nature of corporate financial strategies and the importance of cost management in sustaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025