| __timestamp | Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 2229642000 | 2595900000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2159439000 | 2486400000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2319592000 | 2623900000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 2568511000 | 2980100000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 2719909000 | 3171700000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2932602000 | 3041000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 3334378000 | 3089600000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 3362722000 | 3240400000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3633150000 | 3370000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 4341769000 | 2829300000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1281443000 | 3310500000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, effective cost management is crucial for maintaining competitive advantage. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry giants: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation, from 2014 to 2023.
Over the past decade, Booz Allen Hamilton has seen a significant 95% increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2023. This upward trend reflects strategic investments in growth and innovation. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker's expenses have remained relatively stable, with a slight dip in 2023, indicating a focus on cost efficiency.
Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities. While Booz Allen Hamilton emphasizes expansion, Stanley Black & Decker appears to prioritize operational efficiency. These insights are essential for investors and stakeholders aiming to make informed decisions.
Revenue Insights: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation Performance Compared
Cost of Revenue Trends: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. or Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.