SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and MiMedx Group, Inc.

Biotech SG&A: Alnylam vs. MiMedx Efficiency

__timestampAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.MiMedx Group, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144452600090480000
Thursday, January 1, 201560610000133384000
Friday, January 1, 201689354000179997000
Sunday, January 1, 2017199365000220119000
Monday, January 1, 2018382359000258528000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019479005000198205000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020588420000181022000
Friday, January 1, 2021620639000198359000
Saturday, January 1, 2022770658000208789000
Sunday, January 1, 2023795646000211124000
Monday, January 1, 2024975526000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and MiMedx Group, Inc. offer a fascinating case study in SG&A efficiency from 2014 to 2023. Alnylam's SG&A expenses surged by over 1,600% during this period, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. In contrast, MiMedx's expenses grew by approximately 133%, indicating a more conservative approach.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Alnylam's expenses peaked in 2023, reaching nearly 800% of their 2014 levels, while MiMedx maintained a steadier trajectory, peaking in 2018. This divergence highlights differing strategic priorities: Alnylam's focus on rapid expansion versus MiMedx's emphasis on stability. Investors and industry analysts can glean insights into how these strategies impact long-term financial sustainability and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025