Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or ImmunityBio, Inc.

Biotech Giants: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.ImmunityBio, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014445260004326000
Thursday, January 1, 201560610000226206000
Friday, January 1, 20168935400094391000
Sunday, January 1, 201719936500053821000
Monday, January 1, 201838235900035463000
Tuesday, January 1, 201947900500046456000
Wednesday, January 1, 202058842000071318000
Friday, January 1, 2021620639000135256000
Saturday, January 1, 2022770658000102708000
Sunday, January 1, 2023795646000129620000
Monday, January 1, 2024975526000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for sustaining growth and innovation. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs over the past decade.

Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

From 2014 to 2023, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals saw a significant increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 1,700%. This reflects their aggressive expansion strategy, focusing on scaling operations and market reach. By 2023, their SG&A expenses peaked, indicating a robust investment in administrative capabilities.

ImmunityBio, Inc.

Conversely, ImmunityBio, Inc. maintained a more conservative approach, with SG&A expenses increasing by about 2,900% from 2014 to 2023. Their strategy appears to focus on lean operations, optimizing costs while still supporting growth.

Both companies showcase distinct strategies in managing SG&A costs, reflecting their unique business models and market strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025