SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Trends: Arrowhead vs. BioCryst from 2014-2023

__timestampArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014244195367461000
Thursday, January 1, 20153471808913047000
Friday, January 1, 20164099820911253000
Sunday, January 1, 20173202288013933000
Monday, January 1, 20181911005129514000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192655625737121000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205227589067929000
Friday, January 1, 202180981000118818000
Saturday, January 1, 2022124431000159371000
Sunday, January 1, 202390932000213894000
Monday, January 1, 202498761000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biopharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive landscape of biopharmaceuticals, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown distinct trends in their SG&A spending from 2014 to 2023. Arrowhead's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 300% over this period, peaking in 2022. In contrast, BioCryst's expenses surged by nearly 2800%, with a significant spike in 2023. This divergence highlights differing strategic priorities and operational efficiencies. Notably, BioCryst's 2023 expenses were more than double those of Arrowhead, suggesting a more aggressive expansion or restructuring strategy. However, data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. As these companies navigate the evolving pharmaceutical landscape, their SG&A strategies will be pivotal in determining their competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025