__timestamp | Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 2229642000 | 2595900000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2159439000 | 2486400000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2319592000 | 2623900000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 2568511000 | 2980100000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 2719909000 | 3171700000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2932602000 | 3041000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 3334378000 | 3089600000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 3362722000 | 3240400000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3633150000 | 3370000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 4341769000 | 2829300000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1281443000 | 3310500000 |
Data in motion
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate America, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. have been at the forefront of this analysis. Over the past decade, Booz Allen Hamilton has demonstrated a remarkable 95% increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker's SG&A expenses have shown a more modest growth, with a notable dip in 2023. This divergence highlights Booz Allen's aggressive expansion strategy, while Stanley Black & Decker appears to be optimizing its operational costs. The data from 2014 to 2023 reveals a fascinating narrative of strategic financial management, with Booz Allen's expenses surging from 2.23 billion to 4.34 billion, while Stanley Black & Decker's expenses fluctuated, reaching a high of 3.37 billion in 2022.
Revenue Insights: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation Performance Compared
Cost of Revenue Trends: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. or Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and AECOM: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared