SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Booz Allen vs. Stanley Black & Decker

__timestampBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationStanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201422296420002595900000
Thursday, January 1, 201521594390002486400000
Friday, January 1, 201623195920002623900000
Sunday, January 1, 201725685110002980100000
Monday, January 1, 201827199090003171700000
Tuesday, January 1, 201929326020003041000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202033343780003089600000
Friday, January 1, 202133627220003240400000
Saturday, January 1, 202236331500003370000000
Sunday, January 1, 202343417690002829300000
Monday, January 1, 202412814430003310500000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate America, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. have been at the forefront of this analysis. Over the past decade, Booz Allen Hamilton has demonstrated a remarkable 95% increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker's SG&A expenses have shown a more modest growth, with a notable dip in 2023. This divergence highlights Booz Allen's aggressive expansion strategy, while Stanley Black & Decker appears to be optimizing its operational costs. The data from 2014 to 2023 reveals a fascinating narrative of strategic financial management, with Booz Allen's expenses surging from 2.23 billion to 4.34 billion, while Stanley Black & Decker's expenses fluctuated, reaching a high of 3.37 billion in 2022.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025