SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Gilead Sciences, Inc. and GSK plc

SG&A Efficiency: Gilead vs. GSK's Strategic Approaches

__timestampGSK plcGilead Sciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201482460000002983000000
Thursday, January 1, 201592320000003426000000
Friday, January 1, 201693660000003398000000
Sunday, January 1, 201796720000003878000000
Monday, January 1, 201899150000004056000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019114020000004381000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020114560000005151000000
Friday, January 1, 2021109750000005246000000
Saturday, January 1, 202283720000005673000000
Sunday, January 1, 202393850000006090000000
Monday, January 1, 20246091000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and GSK plc have demonstrated contrasting strategies in this domain.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, GSK plc consistently reported higher SG&A expenses compared to Gilead Sciences, Inc., with an average of approximately $9.8 billion annually. In contrast, Gilead's average was around $4.4 billion, nearly half of GSK's. This disparity highlights GSK's expansive operational strategy, while Gilead's leaner approach suggests a focus on efficiency.

Recent Trends

In 2023, Gilead's SG&A expenses reached $6.09 billion, marking a 104% increase from 2014. Meanwhile, GSK's expenses fluctuated, peaking in 2020 at $11.5 billion before stabilizing. These trends reflect the dynamic nature of the industry and the companies' adaptive strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025