SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing GSK plc and Summit Therapeutics Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: GSK vs. Summit's Strategic Spending

__timestampGSK plcSummit Therapeutics Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201482460000006795238
Thursday, January 1, 201592320000007454247
Friday, January 1, 2016936600000010345862
Sunday, January 1, 2017967200000016984203
Monday, January 1, 2018991500000016187290
Tuesday, January 1, 2019114020000009299233.54
Wednesday, January 1, 20201145600000019232000
Friday, January 1, 20211097500000023611000
Saturday, January 1, 2022837200000026700000
Sunday, January 1, 2023938500000028215000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis compares the SG&A efficiency of GSK plc and Summit Therapeutics Inc. over the past decade.

GSK plc: A Steady Giant

From 2014 to 2023, GSK plc consistently maintained high SG&A expenses, peaking in 2020 at approximately $11.5 billion. Despite fluctuations, GSK's expenses remained relatively stable, reflecting its robust market presence and strategic investments in administrative efficiency.

Summit Therapeutics Inc.: A Growing Challenger

In contrast, Summit Therapeutics Inc. exhibited a significant upward trend in SG&A expenses, growing from $6.8 million in 2014 to $28.2 million in 2023. This 315% increase highlights Summit's aggressive expansion strategy and its commitment to scaling operations.

Conclusion

While GSK's expenses dwarf those of Summit, the latter's rapid growth trajectory suggests a dynamic shift in the competitive landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025