Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: GSK plc vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: GSK vs BioCryst - A Decade of Change

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.GSK plc
Wednesday, January 1, 201474610008246000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015130470009232000000
Friday, January 1, 2016112530009366000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017139330009672000000
Monday, January 1, 2018295140009915000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193712100011402000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206792900011456000000
Friday, January 1, 202111881800010975000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221593710008372000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232138940009385000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: GSK plc vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding the financial dynamics of major players is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent companies: GSK plc and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

GSK plc, a global healthcare giant, consistently reported SG&A expenses exceeding $9 billion annually, peaking in 2020. This reflects their expansive market reach and robust operational framework. In contrast, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a smaller biotech firm, exhibited a significant upward trend, with expenses surging by over 2700% from 2014 to 2023. This growth underscores their aggressive expansion and increased market activities.

The stark contrast in SG&A expenses highlights the diverse strategies and scales of operations between established pharmaceutical leaders and emerging biotech innovators. Such insights are invaluable for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025