__timestamp | Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. | Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 2287709 | 35942000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 6844000 | 40028000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 8586000 | 45853000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 6079000 | 53816000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 8362000 | 60804000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 9467000 | 77252000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 10899000 | 45736000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 14560000 | 50323000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 17968000 | 143526000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 22222000 | 149182000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, managing operational expenses is crucial for sustainable growth. This analysis compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. over the past decade.
From 2014 to 2023, Halozyme's SG&A expenses surged by over 300%, peaking at approximately $149 million in 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in operational capabilities. Despite fluctuations, their strategic focus on scaling operations is evident.
Alpine Immune Sciences, on the other hand, exhibited a more measured increase in SG&A expenses, growing nearly tenfold from 2014 to 2023. Their expenses reached around $22 million in 2023, indicating a cautious yet consistent approach to scaling.
This comparison highlights the diverse strategies employed by biotech firms in managing operational costs, offering insights into their financial health and strategic priorities.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Sanofi or Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc.
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc vs Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc.
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. or ADMA Biologics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. or CRISPR Therapeutics AG: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. vs Bausch Health Companies Inc.
Opthea Limited vs Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. and Veracyte, Inc.
Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. vs Bausch Health Companies Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. and Novavax, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. vs Viridian Therapeutics, Inc. Trends and Insights