SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc.

Biotech SG&A: Halozyme vs. Alpine's Expense Strategies

__timestampAlpine Immune Sciences, Inc.Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014228770935942000
Thursday, January 1, 2015684400040028000
Friday, January 1, 2016858600045853000
Sunday, January 1, 2017607900053816000
Monday, January 1, 2018836200060804000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019946700077252000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201089900045736000
Friday, January 1, 20211456000050323000
Saturday, January 1, 202217968000143526000
Sunday, January 1, 202322222000149182000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, managing operational expenses is crucial for sustainable growth. This analysis compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. over the past decade.

Halozyme's Strategic Growth

From 2014 to 2023, Halozyme's SG&A expenses surged by over 300%, peaking at approximately $149 million in 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in operational capabilities. Despite fluctuations, their strategic focus on scaling operations is evident.

Alpine's Steady Climb

Alpine Immune Sciences, on the other hand, exhibited a more measured increase in SG&A expenses, growing nearly tenfold from 2014 to 2023. Their expenses reached around $22 million in 2023, indicating a cautious yet consistent approach to scaling.

This comparison highlights the diverse strategies employed by biotech firms in managing operational costs, offering insights into their financial health and strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025