SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Johnson & Johnson and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Trends: Johnson & Johnson vs. Catalyst Pharmaceuticals

__timestampCatalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Johnson & Johnson
Wednesday, January 1, 2014447365421954000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015859701021203000000
Friday, January 1, 2016791026019945000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017730439921420000000
Monday, January 1, 20181587596122540000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193688118722178000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204423375422084000000
Friday, January 1, 20214962800020118000000
Saturday, January 1, 20225818300019046000000
Sunday, January 1, 202313371000020112000000
Monday, January 1, 202421969000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Johnson & Johnson and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies. From 2014 to 2023, Johnson & Johnson consistently reported SG&A expenses around $20 billion annually, reflecting its expansive global operations. In contrast, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. demonstrated a remarkable growth trajectory, with SG&A expenses surging from approximately $4.5 million in 2014 to $134 million in 2023, marking a staggering 2,878% increase. This growth underscores Catalyst's aggressive expansion and investment in market penetration. While Johnson & Johnson's stable expenses highlight its mature market position, Catalyst's rising costs indicate its dynamic growth phase. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025